Innovations in 3D Bioprinting for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering

by

Introduction

Skeletal muscle tissue is valuable tissue in the human body since it has features of strength and elasticity needed to enable the body to move and support its weight. However, when there is a large mass defect as a result of trauma, disease, or surgical resection, then developing new muscle is practically impossible using traditional methods of therapy. To this end, scientists have been employing novel strategies in research on skeletal muscle TE, and a special emphasis has been placed on 3D bioprinting. These techniques are advancing the field by providing the systematic construction of fine, biomimetic muscle tissues that duplicate the architecture, mechanical properties, and functions of musculature tissues. This article aims to identify the state of the art in technical advances in 3D bioprinting for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: techniques, materials, and clinical potential for advanced strategies in muscle repair.

The Evolution of 3D Bioprinting in Muscle Tissue Engineering

Stereolithography, or 3D bioprinting, is an efficient method of creating clinical structures and tissues; the approaches allow precise reciprocation of cells and materials. 3D bioprinting has the advantage of being able to create dynamic muscular structures, something that differentiates it from most traditional tissue engineering techniques where scaffolds often do not move. This works with bioinks, which include living cells, biopolymers, and growth factors that are layered successively in 3D to construct tissues. The major objective of muscle tissue engineering is to fabricate an architecture of the skeletal muscle tissue by enduring an aligned topographical pattern of muscle fiber orientation.

Modern developments have observed the incorporation of conductive materials and extensive fabrication strategies in improving the maturation and functions of the muscles formed via bioprinting. Functionally graded conductive hydrogels also have been designed for applications like biotransmission, which is pivotal to muscle contractility and overall tissue function. These materials replicate, in terms of electrical characteristics, the muscle tissue that is received from nature, which allows for myogenic differentiation as well as the development of fully developed muscle fibers.

Yearwise Publication Trend on “3d bioprinting”

Find publication trends on relevant topics

Innovative Bioinks: Bridging the Gap between Technology and Biology

The applications of 3D bioprinting in muscle tissue engineering are therefore greatly influenced by the nature of the bioinks, which should enhance cell survival and functionality. In this case, alginate and gelatin bioinks have been preferred because they are printable and biocompatible for cell culture. Nevertheless, new developments have been directed toward improving these materials by adding other components that increase their mechanical and electrical characteristics.

For example, it has been found that incorporating nanoparticles, particularly PEDOT nanoparticles, into the bioinks improves the electrically conductive nature of the printed bioscaffolds. This conductivity is mandatory for the extension of electrical stimuli to encapsulated muscle cells, thus aligning and maturing them into functioning muscle fibers. Apart from nanoparticles, other conductive ink components have been incorporated into bioinks, including gold nanowires.

Another notable gain is the preparation of cell-laden bioinks where myogenic cells are incorporated into the bioinks, including C2C12 myoblasts renowned for the formation of muscles. The physical characteristics can be further improved through mixing with growth factors and biochemical signals to assist the cells in differentiating into true tissue. Such bioinks facilitate direct fabrication of muscle tissue constructs not only mimicking the native muscle mechanical properties but also promoting their functionality.

Advanced Bioprinting Techniques for Muscle Tissue Regeneration

For the creation of the structural and hierarchical organization of skeletal muscle tissue, scientists have designed and employed various enhanced bioprinting technologies apart from the simple dispersion method. Among them, the pre-shear bioprinting approach applies shear forces when printing to encourage alignment of muscle fibers within the hydrogel. This approach is nearly as anisotropic as the muscle tissue itself, wherein the fibers are aligned in a structure to maximize contraction.

Another technique is known as coaxial extrusion bioprinting, where through the same nozzle more than one bioink can be dispensed. The biocompatibility of this method is well suited to form multilayered structures that could mimic the physiologic niche of skeletal muscle tissue. For instance, coaxial extrusion was used for producing hollow, fibrillary structures imitating the bunarrangement fibers. These constructs are intended to target the parameters that determine nutrient delivery, angiogenesis, and cell viability, which play major roles in the integration of engineered tissues in vivo.

Another area that is getting some attention in the actual bioprinting process is the use of electrical stimulation to enhance the maturation of muscle tissue. Electrical stimulation is an external copy of signals issued by muscle cells in the body, thus a powerful tool in promoting myotube growth and muscle performance. Recent investigations have shown that electrical stimulation enhances the in vitro functionality, organization, and differentiation of the muscle fibers in constructs derived from bioprinting compared to the no electrical signal groups.

Recent Publications on “3d bioprinting”

Find publications on relevant topics

Role of Scaffold Design and Material Innovations

Since the scaffold architecture determines cell alignment, proliferation, and differentiation in skeletal muscle tissue engineering, scaffold design represents an essential step in muscle TE. Microfabrication techniques have been greatly used in the construction of the scaffold, especially with the use of micro and nanofibers, which help in the correct alignment of the muscle cells since in muscles there is well-defined alignment. The scaffold continues to evolve. fabrication techniques, including electrospinning and microfluidic spinning techniques, have succeeded in fabricating aligned fibrous structures, which give the necessary topographical stimuli for muscle regeneration.

Hydrogels are still an essential element of scaffold design thanks to their function of supplying a well-hydrated atmosphere vital to cell sturdiness and action. Recent studies have shifted focus on methods to bring about changes in the properties of hydrogels by introducing biomolecules like RGD peptides responsible for cell adhesion. Moreover, the present surface modification of hydrogels with conductive material enhanced their mechanical properties that are required for muscle tissue engineering.

Another area of interest is stimuli-responsive hydrogels, which have properties that vary in response to their environment, in this case, temperature, pH, or electrical signals, among others. These smart materials can allow the fabrication of ecosystems that can match the in vivo conditions of muscle tissue and therefore add an extra dimension to the control of tissue development and functionality.

Challenges and Future Directions

Nevertheless, the advancement made in the 3D bioprinting of skeletal muscle tissue is still limited by some challenges. There is still a primary challenge, which is the problem of vasculogenesis in the SCMs that are responsible for supplying the cells with nutrients and oxygen. Nowadays, research is being carried out on the re-vascularization of the constructs that are generated by bio-printing of muscle tissue to improve the viability of the muscle constructs and their ability to get integrated into the host tissue.

The last issue is the possibility of translating the bioprinting of muscle tissues into actual clinical practice. Although the present methods can recreate several muscle constructs on a small scale, generating large and complicated tissues for transplantation requires a refining technique. The mentioned challenges are friction to scale up bioprinting as the method’s applicability is likely to be solved with the progress that is expected on multi-material printing, bioprinting automation, and bioreactors for tissue maturation.

The future of 3D bioprinting in muscle tissue engineering relies on the further enhancement of material properties, the technique of 3D bioprinting, and the use of bioactivities that enhance tissue function. Altered bioinks containing patient-derived cells and genetic material to improve the quality of bioprinted muscle tissue provide further potential for individualized therapeutic interventions.

Conclusion

This field of 3D bioprinting for skeletal muscle tissue engineering is quickly growing and developing from advancements in bioink formulation, bioprinting methods, and scaffolding. These are the developments that bring the actualization of constructing bioengineered functional implantable muscle tissue that can be used to reconstruct or replace damaged muscles in patients closer to reality. Speaking of future advancements, research exhibits an optimistic outlook on what is achievable in the future, and 3D bioprinting appears to provide a brand-new perspective for muscle regeneration for people who experience muscle atrophy.

References

  1. Fan, T., Wang, S., Jiang, Z., Ji, S., Cao, W., Liu, W., Ji, Y., Li, Y., Shyh-Chang, N. and Gu, Q., 2021. Controllable assembly of skeletal muscle-like bundles through 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 14(1), p.015009.
  2. Celikkin, N., Presutti, D., Maiullari, F., Fornetti, E., Agarwal, T., Paradiso, A., Volpi, M., Święszkowski, W., Bearzi, C., Barbetta, A. and Zhang, Y.S., 2021. Tackling current biomedical challenges with frontier biofabrication and organ-on-a-chip technologies. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 9, p.732130.
  3. Campiglio, C.E., Carcano, A. and Draghi, L., 2022. RGD‐pectin microfiber patches for guiding muscle tissue regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 110(3), pp.515-524.
  4. Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Luo, S., Chen, Z., Zheng, X., Kankala, R.K., Chen, A. and Wang, S., 2021. 3D bioprinting of conductive hydrogel for enhanced myogenic differentiation. Regenerative Biomaterials, 8(5), p.rbab035.
  5. Shao, L., Hou, R., Zhu, Y. and Yao, Y., 2021. Pre-shear bioprinting of highly oriented porous hydrogel microfibers to construct anisotropic tissues. Biomaterials Science, 9(20), pp.6763-6771.
  6. Lee, H., Kim, W., Lee, J., Park, K.S., Yoo, J.J., Atala, A., Kim, G.H. and Lee, S.J., 2021. Self-aligned myofibers in 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix-based construct accelerate skeletal muscle function restoration. Applied physics reviews, 8(2).
  7. Quint, J.P., Mostafavi, A., Endo, Y., Panayi, A., Russell, C.S., Nourmahnad, A., Wiseman, C., Abbasi, L., Samandari, M., Sheikhi, A. and Nuutila, K., 2021. In vivo printing of nanoenabled scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. Advanced healthcare materials, 10(10), p.2002152.
  8. Zhao, M., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Tao, T. and Qin, J., 2021. A flexible microfluidic strategy to generate grooved microfibers for guiding cell alignment. Biomaterials Science, 9(14), pp.4880-4890.

Top Experts on “3d bioprinting“